Public Workshop: California Corporate Greenhouse Gas Reporting

As most environmental professionals in California know, the state recently passed new legislation that imposes new greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reporting requirements.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) will hold a virtual public workshop on March 23, 2026, to provide an update on additional information related to the Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions reporting deadline of August 10, 2026.

Additionally, the workshop will discuss the next stage of regulatory development including a summary of GHG reporting requirements for 2027-2030 and preliminary options for Scope 3 reporting requirements.

CARB staff will be seeking input on alternative approaches as well as a discussion of CARB's approach to economic analysis.

To register for the virtual workshop, which will be held on March 23, 2026, from 1 PM to 4 PM PDT, click on this link: 

Corporate GHG Reporting Workshop Registration

For more information about these reporting and financial requirements, click on this link: More Information

Finally, if you are a corporate environmental professional or consultant involved with these reporting requirements, please let us know how difficult (or easy) complying with these requirements will be in the comments section below.

The Impact of Trump's Recision of the Endangerment Finding for Greenhouse Gases on California's Air Pollution Regulations

California is facing a complex and new legal battle over the regulation of CO2 emissions and greenhouse gases. As a result, previous federal approvals for California to have stricter regulations may be disallowed. 

Photo Credit: California Air Resources Board (ARB)

The Trump administration recently rescinded the Endangerment Finding - something that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) previously made that showed - on a legal and scientific basis - that carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases were a danger to public health. This new move is one of the more significant changes in environmental policy that the United States government has ever made.

So how does this affect California?

1. EPA previously granted federal "waivers" to California to allow it to set air quality standards more stringent than federal ones. By removing the endangerment finding, EPA now can argue that California has no legal need or authority to regulate CO2 to protect its citizens.

2. California's existing laws remain in place, however, their enforceability may no longer exist should EPA's removal of the endangerment finding survive legal challenges. As a result, the requirements in California laws like AB32 (The Global Warming Solutions Act) may not be allowed.

For example. one such requirement that may not be allowed is California's mandate that all new cars sold in the state be zero-emission vehicles by 2035.

3. The endangerment finding repeal also raises questions as to the legal basis for limits on stationary sources such as power plants and other industries. Certain industry groups may now sue, arguing that state rules are now preempted by federal regulations.

4. All of the above moves environmental regulation into the courtroom, for an undetermined amount of time. California is preparing a legal challenge that the endangerment repeal ignores years and years of proven climate science and legal decisions.

5. Businesses will now face years of uncertainty - do they need to follow federal regulations or California regualtions while they wait for what could be years for a final legal determination to be made?

6. California may attempt to reclassify CO2 under state health codes/laws, thereby bypassing federal regulations. Even if California does that, such a move would surely be challenged by the current federal adminstration.

What do you think about this? Please leave your comments, pro or con, below.

Trump ignores science and uses a shaky legal argument to repeal EPA's previous greenhouse gas regulations

Today, despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary and the objections of many, President Donald Trump's EPA finalized a rule that repeals the agency's previous decision that greenhouse gases endangered public health and welfare. By doing so, Trump reverses actions the EPA has taken to regulate the emissions of such pollutants.

As a result of this ruling, Trump's EPA can argue that it no longer has the legal authority to regulate greenhouse gases and the resultant global warming/climate change impacts they have. Additionally, EPA will now finalize the repeal of existing regulations that required strict tailpipe emission standards for cars and light trucks. 

The decision is destined to be challenged by numerous groups, however, using some of the following arguments:

1. The ruling is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.

2. Previous U.S. Supreme Court precedent (Massachusetts v. EPA, 2007) established that greenhouse gases are air pollutants subject to regulation by the EPA if they are found to endanger public health.

3. Today's decision is based on a shaky legal argument that ignores existing climate science that should result in challenges by experts in the field.

4. A slim possibility exists that Congress could develop a new law specifically directing EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. However, this will be practically impossible as long as Trump remains in power and his supporters maintain majorities in the House and Senate.

The Day the Earth Caught Fire - a prescient vision from 65 years ago?

This a bit different from our usual posts. We recently watched an old British sci-fi film that has a strikingly familiar relationship to the world today.

Here's a synposis. Please comment if you agree or disagree that many of the points in this film are similar to what is happening to our world today, both environmentally and politically.

Movie Poster Credit: IMDB, Fair Use

Released in 1961, The Day the Earth Caught Fire is a classic British science-fiction disaster film that manages to feel both like a vintage Cold War relic and a startlingly modern cautionary tale.

Movie Summary

The story is told through the eyes of Peter Stenning, a cynical, hard-drinking journalist for the Daily Express in London. After the United States and the Soviet Union simultaneously detonate massive nuclear bombs, the world begins to experience freakish weather: monsoons in the desert, massive fogs, and a relentless, skyrocketing heatwave.

Stenning and his colleague Bill Maguire discover a terrifying truth the government is trying to suppress: the dual explosions were so powerful they knocked the Earth 11 degrees off its axis and altered its orbit, sending the planet spiraling toward the Sun. As London withers under a "heat mist" and water rationing leads to riots, scientists prepare a last-ditch effort to "kick" the Earth back into orbit with more nuclear detonations. The film ends on a famously ambiguous note, showing two prepared newspaper headlines: "World Saved" and "World Doomed," while the sound of church bells (in the US version) or silence (in the original) leaves the outcome to the viewer’s imagination.

---

Comparison to Modern Climate Change

While the film’s "nuclear-induced orbit shift" is scientifically impossible, its depiction of a planet in environmental freefall resonates deeply with today's climate crisis.

• Human-Caused Catastrophe: Both the film and modern climate change share the central theme of anthropogenic (human-caused) disaster. In 1961, the fear was that our technology (nuclear weapons) would destroy us instantly; today, the fear is that our technology (fossil fuel reliance) is destroying us gradually.
• The "Slow Burn" of Panic: The movie masterfully depicts the transition from "it’s just a weird summer" to "the world is ending." This mirrors the current global experience, where what was once dismissed as "unusual weather" is increasingly recognized as a systemic, existential threat.
• Government Obfuscation: A major plot point involves the British government downplaying the severity of the crisis to prevent panic. This echoes modern frustrations regarding political "greenwashing" or the slow pace of governmental response to climate data.
• Social Breakdown and Resource Scarcity: The scenes of water rationing, dried-up rivers (like the Thames in the film), and social unrest are no longer just sci-fi tropes but are mirrored in real-world droughts and climate-driven migration today.
• The "Technological Fix": The film concludes with the hope that the very thing that caused the problem (nuclear bombs) can solve it. This parallels modern debates over geoengineering—the idea that we might use large-scale technological interventions to "fix" the atmosphere we’ve damaged.

"Perhaps in the next few hours, there will be no remembrance of the past, and no hope for the future... All the works of Man will be consumed in the great fire out of which he was created." — The Day the Earth Caught Fire

It’s a haunting film that definitely sticks with you—especially that final shot of the two conflicting newspaper headlines. It’s rare for a 60-year-old movie to feel more relevant today than it did upon its release.

Here's a link to the original movie trailer: The Day the Earth Caught Fire

Our thanks to Google's Gemini for its asistance in summarizing the above.