Free Bulky Waste Drop-Off Event in Bakersfield on April 11, 2026

Do you have some bulky materials you need to get rid of or just don't need anymore? Well, the city of Bakersfield is hosting a Bulky Item Drop-Off event this Saturday, April 11, 2026, from 8 a.m. to noon. The location is 15050 Stockdale Highway (near the end of the Westside Parkway). 

The event is free but, there are some limitations, such as no hazardous waste, no commercial waste, no liquid waste, nothing over 300 lbs, etc.

For a list of items accepted and not accepted:

Accepted Items/Not Accepted Items

And here is the same list for our Spanish speaking friends: 

Ejemplos de Artículos Aceptables / No Aceptables

 

Public Workshop: California Corporate Greenhouse Gas Reporting

As most environmental professionals in California know, the state recently passed new legislation that imposes new greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reporting requirements.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) will hold a virtual public workshop on March 23, 2026, to provide an update on additional information related to the Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions reporting deadline of August 10, 2026.

Additionally, the workshop will discuss the next stage of regulatory development including a summary of GHG reporting requirements for 2027-2030 and preliminary options for Scope 3 reporting requirements.

CARB staff will be seeking input on alternative approaches as well as a discussion of CARB's approach to economic analysis.

To register for the virtual workshop, which will be held on March 23, 2026, from 1 PM to 4 PM PDT, click on this link: 

Corporate GHG Reporting Workshop Registration

For more information about these reporting and financial requirements, click on this link: More Information

Finally, if you are a corporate environmental professional or consultant involved with these reporting requirements, please let us know how difficult (or easy) complying with these requirements will be in the comments section below.

The Impact of Trump's Recision of the Endangerment Finding for Greenhouse Gases on California's Air Pollution Regulations

California is facing a complex and new legal battle over the regulation of CO2 emissions and greenhouse gases. As a result, previous federal approvals for California to have stricter regulations may be disallowed. 

Photo Credit: California Air Resources Board (ARB)

The Trump administration recently rescinded the Endangerment Finding - something that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) previously made that showed - on a legal and scientific basis - that carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases were a danger to public health. This new move is one of the more significant changes in environmental policy that the United States government has ever made.

So how does this affect California?

1. EPA previously granted federal "waivers" to California to allow it to set air quality standards more stringent than federal ones. By removing the endangerment finding, EPA now can argue that California has no legal need or authority to regulate CO2 to protect its citizens.

2. California's existing laws remain in place, however, their enforceability may no longer exist should EPA's removal of the endangerment finding survive legal challenges. As a result, the requirements in California laws like AB32 (The Global Warming Solutions Act) may not be allowed.

For example. one such requirement that may not be allowed is California's mandate that all new cars sold in the state be zero-emission vehicles by 2035.

3. The endangerment finding repeal also raises questions as to the legal basis for limits on stationary sources such as power plants and other industries. Certain industry groups may now sue, arguing that state rules are now preempted by federal regulations.

4. All of the above moves environmental regulation into the courtroom, for an undetermined amount of time. California is preparing a legal challenge that the endangerment repeal ignores years and years of proven climate science and legal decisions.

5. Businesses will now face years of uncertainty - do they need to follow federal regulations or California regualtions while they wait for what could be years for a final legal determination to be made?

6. California may attempt to reclassify CO2 under state health codes/laws, thereby bypassing federal regulations. Even if California does that, such a move would surely be challenged by the current federal adminstration.

What do you think about this? Please leave your comments, pro or con, below.

Trump ignores science and uses a shaky legal argument to repeal EPA's previous greenhouse gas regulations

Today, despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary and the objections of many, President Donald Trump's EPA finalized a rule that repeals the agency's previous decision that greenhouse gases endangered public health and welfare. By doing so, Trump reverses actions the EPA has taken to regulate the emissions of such pollutants.

As a result of this ruling, Trump's EPA can argue that it no longer has the legal authority to regulate greenhouse gases and the resultant global warming/climate change impacts they have. Additionally, EPA will now finalize the repeal of existing regulations that required strict tailpipe emission standards for cars and light trucks. 

The decision is destined to be challenged by numerous groups, however, using some of the following arguments:

1. The ruling is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.

2. Previous U.S. Supreme Court precedent (Massachusetts v. EPA, 2007) established that greenhouse gases are air pollutants subject to regulation by the EPA if they are found to endanger public health.

3. Today's decision is based on a shaky legal argument that ignores existing climate science that should result in challenges by experts in the field.

4. A slim possibility exists that Congress could develop a new law specifically directing EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. However, this will be practically impossible as long as Trump remains in power and his supporters maintain majorities in the House and Senate.